Which of the following answers best defines what the funder looks for in the Evaluation Plan section of the grant proposal?

In evaluating a grant proposal, funders typically prioritize clarity of objectives and expected outcomes in the Evaluation Plan section. This is because a well-defined set of objectives serves as the foundation for measuring the project's success and demonstrating its impact. Clear objectives articulate what the project intends to achieve, making it easier for funders to understand the importance and direction of the project.

Additionally, expected outcomes need to be specific and measurable, which reinforces accountability and demonstrates a commitment to evaluating the project's effectiveness. A robust evaluation plan outlines how the project will assess progress toward its goals, providing the funder with assurance that grant funds will be utilized in a way that generates tangible results. By establishing a clear framework for evaluating success, the proposal becomes more compelling and demonstrates the applicant's strategic planning and foresight.

Other aspects like checks and balances, relevance to funding goals, and cost-effectiveness are indeed important in a grant proposal, but they do not hold the same weight as having well-defined objectives and expected outcomes in the context of the Evaluation Plan. This clarity is crucial for evaluators who are looking to determine the feasibility and potential impact of the proposed project.