Which of the following answers best defines a question the funder is looking to answer in the Program Design section of the grant proposal?

The question regarding "Are the SMART objectives written correctly?" closely aligns with what funders seek in the Program Design section of a grant proposal. This section primarily focuses on how the proposed program will be implemented, including strategies, methodologies, and objectives that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

Clearly articulated SMART objectives demonstrate that the project is well-thought-out and highlights the expected outcomes. Funders look for this information as it indicates the proposal's ability to deliver measurable results, which aligns with their funding goals and requirements. It illustrates the project's feasibility and the applicant's understanding of what constitutes effective program design.

In contrast, queries about the total project budget, staffing, and project duration, while significant, do not specifically address the core aspects of program design. These elements are important for understanding the overall viability and logistics of the project but do not delve into the effectiveness or clarity of the program's objectives. Thus, the strength of the answer lies in its direct relevance to the intent of the Program Design section.